Thursday, January 28, 2010

It might be legal, but it isn't fair....

The unmask the truth campaign is something I saw in the US and wanted to comment on. In the US law there is a loophole that allows US sparkling wines to be called "Champagne" which is a misuse of the appelation because Champagne refers to a geographical region in France rather than a category of wine in general... This being said, I am not going to go into the "Coke/Carbonated drink" or "Kleenex/Tissue paper" debacle, but I thought the campaign of "unmask the truth" was interesting however, I still think the original tagline "It might be legal, but it isn't fair" a much better one. Some thing it is on the defensive and victimizing side, but I thought it truly touched the nerve that exceptions do not make the rules.

1 comment:

Jiji said...

In australia, everything is called sparkling wine unless it is in fact FROM Champagne, France.
As for the coke, kleenex argument. It has been established that if a particular brand of a product becomes so popular that the brand name is used to describe the same product even though its not from the same brand, it is NOT a violation of copyright/trade mark.
For example: Pyrex. It a brand name however it describes any glassware tray. Esky, another brand but used to describe all coolers. Coke, used to describe all carbonated drinks, and so on.