Saturday, August 1, 2015
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
|Image credit GM|
I love wordsmithing, and Leo Burnett (the man) was famous for keeping a copybook in his drawer which had new slang words for him to use in his ads. But those words were actually things people sad previously, not words he invented like the above verb. Ex, there's a "Lebanese" verb that goes "banchar el douleb" (the tyre went flat), but the word banchar comes from "puncture". So using that word would be great in an ad, inventing a new one somehow fails.
Tuesday, July 28, 2015
|This is what the client wants - artwork by Tarek Chemaly|
Let me start this blog post with a clarification, I am not one who compares anything to the holocaust. No matter where you stand politically today in Lebanon, not admitting that the holocaust was an atrocious act is morally irresponsible. Sadly, my moral standpoint for comparison stands ground.
First let me explain the rationale and background of this post: Adolf Eichmann was the man engineered and executed the holocaust, after fleeing to Argentina, he was caught in what could amount to suspicious circumstances and tried and later hanged by the Israeli judicial system. Eichmann's defense was simple, "I was following orders". In his mind he was an innocent bureaucrat on whom the moral responsibility of the killings did not reside. Covering the Eichmann trial, Hannah Arendt wrote the book "the banality of evil" and Stanley Miligram later came up with his chilling but oh so revealing experiments based on the Eichmann defense.
All of this is so atrocious, but daring to apply to apply this to advertising is not out of bounds. I have often heard the excuse for stealing as "l'client heik baddo" (this is what the client wants). How far removed is this from "I was following orders"? Well, it is not. You are absolving the moral responsibility of your stealing and blaming it on the client when you as a designer, advertiser, communicator, are an accessory to the act but refuse to admit it. The easiest justification is "if I don't do it, someone else will (and I would have lost the client in the process)", perhaps this is right, but two wrongs do not make right. You are still stealing other people's mental, creative and hard-earned efforts and simply duplicating them for your own clients.
This has happened repeatedly in Lebanon, and there's always an "easy" way out - blame the client, take the moral weight off your back. Really? And we dare call the war that happened in Lebanon "other people's war on our land", same rationale. Just blame it on someone, anyone, you might have pulled the trigger but there's always a justifier to blame it on "the client" (your political, religious, militia leader).
You have contributed to stealing other people's work, blaming in on the client does not take you off the hook, you are still a thief - no matter what the client wants. Well, maybe the client does want a thief like you. You'd be the perfect match to the client in that case.
Monday, July 27, 2015
|Artwork by Tarek Chemaly (the "Shams Building" series - Ph-Auto Project)|
Ideas flow, no one can stop them, they are born to be shared and popularized, they are here to better our lives and enrich them. Sure, there are claims that everything has been said before and there's nothing new under the sun. But that's not true. Building on ideas brings new refreshing, invigorating, frisson-inducing ideas.
People often do the unmistakable error, confusing "information" for "knowledge". Information is just that, facts and figures. Which are incredibly important, I am not negating that. Knowledge is how to put them together, to make sense of them, so that the combination of all these independent facts and figures become more than the sum of their parts.
Have you ever been exposed to Maison Margiela and its founder Martin Margiela (who is no longer part of the house) couture ideas? Every new collection comes brimming with deconstructed ideas, new interpretation of older concepts, they even have a "replica" line. Found clothing which they reinterpret in the highest possible materials. Their best selling sneaker is a reinterpretation of a shoe that was worn by the German army during training. That is genius if there was one.
Have you ever had lunch with Farid Chehab? He is the honorary chairman of Leo Burnett MENA. Thankfully, it is not his position that impresses me. Already an early septuagenarian, and having previously suffered from a debilitating ski accident earlier this year (from which he recovered), you'll have problems keeping up with him. He shoots an idea, as soon as you grasp it, he'd already shot you another, as you struggle with the new one, he's already on a roll and that's just the hors-d'oeuvres (and with this I mean the food not the ideas). Three hours later, because that's an average time for lunch with Farid, you leave the table richer, more educated. And by "educated" I take it in the biggest, widest possible sense.
I don't pretend it is clear cut to say how ideas get generated, or if they have clear ownership. But taking an information from a blog without crediting it is wrong. It is a theft. Copying an idea from someone else and claiming it yours is theft too. Looking at a colleague's computer screen, or portfolio, and spending time at the office doing hours to send the same idea to the boss who is on business trip to Tokyo is also theft. Yes, you can build on ideas and change them to come up with new interesting ones, but you cannot steal ideas outright and still claim them and go to on television and say "I am the new face of advertising in the Middle East". That is arrogance, the kind of arrogance that comes with thieves who think they will never be caught.
I remember the first time I exposed a stolen ad, it was circulating wildly over the email and having been a frequent contributor to the ArabAd magazine I sent it to them and it made a scandal. It is still there in the ArabAd archives, a testimony of a time prior to the current days when you can catch an ad thief by a simple google search. But sadly, the more ubiquitous the availability of information, the more frequent the theft. Especially for today's generation which is used to getting everything for free and ready-made.
An architecture student (even if I do not teach architecture as of yet) asked me about "modular buildings" in the library, I gently guided him to search for "La Cite Radieuse" by Le Corbusier. Five minutes later he comes back with the answer "but it's already been done before!". I had to explain to him that I did not want him to copy it, simply look at it and get inspired to how to change it to apply it to his own project.
A creative mind never sleeps, this whole blog post came to me in my morning walk which I have to take for my diabetes. There's no rest for a creative mind, no office hours. But between building on older ideas and re-conceptualizing them, and stealing them outright thinking no one would notice, there's a big unethical margin. It is called theft.
Sunday, July 26, 2015
|Photo credit: GM|
Saturday, July 25, 2015
|Artworks by Fady Chahine|
Let me be clear from the start, suing me is not going to shut me up. If anything it will make me more vocal. The "plaintiff" in my case (whose name I will not mention since I signed a paper at the cybercrime bureau not to mention his name on this blog till after the trial) is constructing a convoluted scenario. For him, I am just a side dish - he wants to use me to prove that his former employer is using me as a "façade" (me and my blog that is) to get back at him since the said employer is already suing the plaintiff for embezzlement (which is theft).
Let me assure you, my IQ is 129 (one level down from 130 which is "genius") so I am not dumb enough for anyone to use me. Not only that, I have no contact whatsoever with his former employer, nor am I aware of where their offices are located, nor do I care about the other trial. Half of the questions I was asked at the cybercrime bureau had to do with the plaintiff's other trial and I knew that the cybercrime bureau was trying (most likely with the help of the political strings the plaintiff pulled) to prove a connection between me and the plaintiff's former employer.
What the plaintiff does not understand is that he already lost the case.
If the court, with the help of my substantial proofs, will agree why I called him thief (which he considers as defamation) then I won the case. If it doesn't, the plaintiff will be tried in the court of public opinion because I am going to release those proofs online and he'd lose the case again.
If his former employer wins the case, embezzlement is theft, so this substantiates my own claim and if the verdict in the other case comes before mine then this proves my own claims. If it comes after mine, I will ask for a retrial and use the other verdict to make sure that my own calling of him as "thief" was correct.
No matter how you flip it, turn it, or look at it - he lost the case.
The artworks above, by my former student and current friend Fady Chahine, have to do with the acronym NTSC that this blog is very linked to (whereas originally it meant Never Twice Same City, we toyed around with it to make it "Never Try Stealing Concepts") the funky line is a sentence said in funerals in Lebanon "may God compensate you with the rest of you life" which has been transformed into "may God compensate you for what's left of your career".
Let me be clear again, if you earned a salary from a company, you cannot use the concepts you came up with during that tenure if they were unsold and sell them again to a client (same or different) after you left because the intellectual property of that idea belongs to the employer who paid you. If you do that, then this is theft. If you see a concept done by someone else, you cannot reuse it because that is theft. Copying a TV ad frame per frame is theft.
Ideas are sacred, it is not because they are untouchable that they become free for everyone to borrow. If you steal a physical object, society automatically condemns you as a thief, if you steal something intangible and untouchable, then the territory is murky. It should not be. Stealing an idea makes you a thief. Period. I am a staunch defender of ideas, I respect them, and I hold them dear...
So to sum it up: Suing me will not shut me up.
It will make me even more vocal.
Live with that, or as those visuals clearly say, let your career die with that.
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
|Artwork by Tarek Chemaly|
And so it finally happened, I found someone else who enjoys (and maybe needs) the bus system as a way of commuting (easily, calmly, punctually) throughout the city and further on. I was never keen on driving, I learned it late and never enjoyed it and had to stop it due to hearing issues (the problem with the hearing meant I could not anticipate what other drivers were going to do - my own driving even if not enjoyed was top notch). So what did I do? I went back to taking busses as I always have.
Photos of ads you see on this blog were taken from busses - which are higher than cars and end up being eye to eye with ad billboards. Other advantages the bus offers include someone else driving so you can use two hands while shooting, they also imply getting to your appointment calmly and without nervous issues because someone else was suffering the traffic instead of you. I was never late to an appointment, no parking problems hindered me (try doing that in Hamra and then tell me how it feels). My Dutch friend who came to holiday in Lebanon enjoyed enormously switching through three busses and paying 3,33 USD to get from Jounieh to Tyr. It was a day off, so waiting a few minutes for the bus to fill was more of a joy than a dread and almost an anthropological experiment.
So here it is below, what I got yesterday from the super interesting project called Bus Map Project which you can find via Facebook:
"Public transportation in Lebanon suffers from an image problem, a problem so endemic, that many people don’t even know it exists. Even the acting Minister of Public Works and Transportation, the guy supposed to be its biggest “brand ambassador,” has been quoted as saying that public transport doesn’t “actually exist.”
How do you promote a service to people convinced it doesn’t exist? Bus Map Project is a campaign seeking to build a community around this question -- a question that requires a collective answer.
We want to start by sharing stories, tips and experiences from regular (and occasional) riders, because that’s how our bus system has always worked; you figure it out by asking people. This is part of the charm of our cities, and it’s something we want to celebrate.
Our cities also have a logic. Mapping Lebanon’s complex tangle of bus and van networks will hopefully show how it all holds together, how it works, and where it needs improvement. In the coming months, we hope to gather enough support to launch a call for action to collectively map the whole public transport system. We don’t know when this project will end, but we are certain that it will be a learning experience for everyone involved because mapping is about more than lines on a page — it’s about forging and extending connections."
And before we go why not check this beautiful graduation project from Elsy Nohra on the bus system image!