Monday, July 23, 2007

The thin red line: Play it again Sa...ad!




The death of MP Walid Eido has left a vacant seat in the Beirut Sunni seat, therefore a side parliamentary election is to take place. Three candidates have deposited their candidacy, among which one from the "Moustaqbal" list - which is backed and headed by Saad Hariri - son of slain PM Rafic Hariri. The ads for the campaign of the Itani candidates are now all out, and the signature of the campaign is "Beirut Khat Ahmar" (Beirut is a red line). The signature is in direct reply to the words of Hizbullah's Hassan Nasrallah when - at the beginning of the recent confrontation between Muslim Extremists "Fatah al Islam" and the Lebanese army in the north - he proclaimed the Palestinian camps where the militants were entrenched as "a red line" (i.e. not to be crossed or entered by force). The headline of the ads is "Beirut ma bitmut" (Beirut will never die), one of the visual interpretations has a series of coffins on in - four to be precise - it is the assumption that the four coffins belong to the MPs from the list who have already died in explosions (Rafic Hariri, Gebran Tueini, Walid Eido, and Basil Fuleihan).
The Mustaqbal party once more plays the emotional card, even the guilt trip one, as Saad Hariri did say "Either you are with us, or with the murderers"... Reminiscent of "Either you are with us, or with the terrorists" (George W. Bush).

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Not any green... Army green!






As a former lieutenant in the Lebanese army, Beirut/NTSC strongly supports the military institution. The recent tumult in the north of Lebanon has however drawn all the Lebanese population behind the army so much it has become a fad more than anything else. Immediately, advertising jumped on the bandwagon and billboards, TV ads and the whole she bang was released.

Soon however, repetition hit (How many times can Hollywood music be put on beauty shots of soldiers before it becomes repetitive?), but some of the interesting samples are shown above:

The first refers to the Phenix legend (My ashes are a life to Lebanon).

The second refers to the cedar trees of Lebanon which are also found on the flag with the headline: For "it" to remain green.

The third to the national anthem (In the full eye of the nation - taken from the lyrics of the anthem).

An honorable mention goes to a billboard where the "camouflage" of the army is in the pattern of the map of Lebanon and whose headling goes "Al Amrou lak" (The order is yours) - a classical expression in the military is "The order is mine" to indicate who is in charge of the situation.

But of course, the question is - as with every other unsigned campaign - who is finacing this and why? (The only exception is a series of billboards signed "Aboumerhi group" a shipping company... But the rest, with signatures such as "the Lebanese people" or simply with no signature beg the question of who and why!)

Beirut/NTSC scores interview with Lance Price (Former communications director at the Labour party)


In an interview with Lance Price, former communications director of the labour party in Britain, Tarek Chemaly inquires about what makes a good political campaign, about the image legacy of Tony Blair, and if advertisers are allowed to be “hired guns” or not politically.


As the communications director who accompanied the new labour, what do you think the legacy of the past decade will be for England and the world at large?


Many people consider it was ‘Iraq’, for others it was ‘Spin’. And for those who couldn’t choose between the two it was ‘the spinning of Iraq’. But to be fair, Mr. Blair is the first Prime Minister in my lifetime to leave office without his record being tarnished by any of the following: economic crisis, civil or industrial unrest, mass unemployment, devaluation or public spending cuts. That’s not spin, it’s a fact. Nobody would claim that the government has achieved everything it set out to do, or that everything it has done has been a success. There have been huge disappointments and some terrible errors along the way. But peace in Northern Ireland? Hospital waiting times slashed? Record investment in schools? A minimum wage? Devolution that works? Near full employment? Civil partnerships? Economic growth every quarter? Millions lifted out of poverty? It’s a legacy to be proud of in my opinion.

Do you think the Iraq war quagmire will undermine the image of Tony Blair forever? And do you think Gordon Brown will be able to carry on in the same vein of policies?

Not forever but for a long time. Iraq is of course part of his legacy and for many people it was the one thing that changed their minds about him. We should remember, however, that when the UK helped the Americans invade the policy had the support of most British people, and even after the war went so badly wrong Blair won another general election. Given time people will also remember many positive things about what the Blair government achieved, especially in domestic matters. Brown cannot follow the same line. He has to show he is different if he is to win the next election. Already he is signaling in a very clever way that he will not be “joined at the hip” with George W. Bush. But it is a difficult balancing act and we do not know yet whether he will succeed.


Are there any specific rules and regulations for a political campaign to be effective?... Even though you are on the labour side, you actually do concede that Saatchi & Saatchi's classic "Labour isn't working" campaign was a hit. What makes it so?


A good political advertising campaign should be simple and witty, but it must also strike a chord with people and reflect what they are already inclined to think. So ‘Labour Isn’t Working’ was a great ad campaign. It said several things at once – unemployment, government incompetence etc. It was a great negative ad, although it said nothing about the alternative. The Conservatives had another good ad when John Major was fighting Neil Kinnock (Labour) in 1992. Two boxing gloves and the caption “Double Whammy” – suggesting people would be hit twice with higher taxes and higher prices. But then when Blair came along the Tories lost their touch. They had posters showing Blair with devils’ eyes (‘Demon Eyes’ campaign) but nobody believed he was a devil so it didn’t work. They had a slogan ‘New Labour, New Danger’ which seemed clever too but because nobody thought New Labour was dangerous it failed too. Labour had some very good campaigns also, some positive ‘Things Can Only Get Better’ (1997) and some negative such as when they put up a poster of the Tory leader William Hague in Mrs. Thatcher’s wig (2001) – again it mixed humour with a message people believed, that Hague was just more of what they hated about Thatcher.


Do you think you can do a political campaign for a rival? Do you believe that a political campaign has to stem from a personal conviction - or are we as advertising people, simply "hired guns"?


If you are good at your job you can do a political campaign for anyone. In fact it is a good exercise to try to imagine what your political opponents would run as a campaign against you. If you try to think of the best idea they could use to attack you it helps you to understand your own weaknesses.

Apart from contributing to travel guides, you wrote a political memoir "The Spin Doctor's Diary" and a novel "Time and Fate". Both were set on 10 Downing Street, both filled with ruthless politicians and dirty tricks and so on... How far is fiction from reality in your writing, and why did you say that writing a novel was more difficult?

Good political fiction has to be realistic although you can make the characters even larger than life. There were things in my novel that could never happen in real life, but that is OK in satire. Also there are many events in real life politics that make you say “if this was in a novel nobody would believe it”. Truth really is stranger than fiction sometimes.

Well, reports indicate that recently the World's view of the United States has declined massively, what could be some measures taken by the US to restore their image? In the Middle East specifically, the US-Israeli ties are the source of the media blunder it seems, how can the US actually still defend its strategic position all while selling its ideologies?

That is a question for the Americans and not me fortunately.

Going back to the new labour campaign, M People's "Moving on up" was associated with the campaign, who made such a strategic choice to link the image of the party to a specific pop song?

We are always looking for catchy pop tunes to use in political campaigns. Moving on Up was OK because it was uplifting and optimistic, but I bet most people didn’t really understand any great political message from it. I think it was probably Peter Mandleson’s idea. Much better was D:Ream’s ‘Things Can Only Get Better’ which was the campaign tune for Labour in 1997. The message was perfect and it was positive and optimistic without promising too much – just like the campaign.

Bio:
Lance Price is a freelance writer, broadcaster and commentator. He appears regularly on television and radio, principally in the UK but also worldwide. His columns appear in The Guardian and elsewhere. He has over fifteen years' experience as a BBC Correspondent and spent three years working in political communications at 10 Downing Street and for the Labour Party. He is the author of two books, The Spin Doctor's Diary, an account of his time working at No.10 Downing Street, and Time and Fate, a novel. He has written for television documentaries and worked on plays for both radio and TV.

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Pot pourri...







So Sony released their father's day ad: Your dad is not a horse's behind... Quite catchy for someone looking to buy a present. Sadly, the rest of the installments of the campaign (Including "Your uncle is not a tool") were not as poignant and intersting.
Clorox - to is benefit - has strayed from the usual cleaning products strategies of the before and after - and went a little dreamy with a copy insisting that Clorox cleans "even the imaginary parts"!
San Francisco being one of the fiefs of the gay movement, and since the month of June is considered "Pride month" culminating in the gay parade (Which basically is nothing more than a cash cow for merchants there) the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered community (LGBT) which takes from the rainbow as its flag and emblem has been targetted by a specific advertising campaign "when did this become part of us".
Abebooks.com went wild with a press campaign about "If you can't find it here, it doesn't exist" - which reminded Beirut/NTSC of another bookstore campaign (FNAC in France) which went "You will be sure to find what you were NOT looking for".
The last sampe of ad comes from Washington DC - which is a part of the Chipotte campaign stressing on their use of meats which have been naturally grown.

San Francisco food bank





Beirut/NTSC has recently been to San Francisco - the above is a campaign for the San Francisco food bank. The campaign gets an honorable mention for being though-provoking without being cheap... A call for action without actually playing the guilt card.